Free tool, not actively developed; no accounts. AEO Platform no longer sells subscriptions.
AI Competitor Analysis Guide
How to track and outperform competitors in AI responses
Mapping the competitive AI landscape
The first step in AI competitor analysis is identifying who actually appears in AI responses for your category. This often differs from your traditional search competitors. A brand that ranks poorly in Google organic results might have strong AI engine visibility due to authoritative content, strong entity signals, or effective llms.txt implementation. Conversely, a top-ranking SEO competitor might be invisible to AI engines.
Mapping the AI competitive landscape involves running a broad set of category queries across all major engines and cataloguing which brands appear. This reveals your true AI competitors — the brands that appear alongside or instead of you when potential customers ask AI engines about your category. You may discover competitors you were not monitoring, or find that some traditional competitors are not yet visible in AI responses.
Monitoring tools automate this mapping by analysing many query responses to build a competitive landscape view. The result identifies your most frequent AI competitors, how often each appears, and which engines favour which competitors. This landscape view is the foundation for targeted competitive strategies.
Share of Model benchmarking
Share of Model benchmarking compares your brand's mention frequency against competitors across the same query set. This provides a direct, quantifiable measure of competitive positioning in AI responses. If your competitor has 30% Share of Model in your category and you have 15%, you know exactly how large the gap is and can track progress in closing it.
Effective benchmarking requires consistency: the same query bank, the same engines, the same time intervals. This allows you to distinguish genuine competitive shifts from noise. Run your query bank against all engines for your brand and all tracked competitors, producing comparable Share of Model scores that reflect true relative positioning.
Benchmarking should be segmented by query type for maximum insight. Your competitor might dominate informational queries ("what is X?") while you lead in transactional queries ("best X for Y"). Or you might be strong on ChatGPT but weak on Perplexity relative to a specific competitor. Segmented benchmarking reveals these patterns and helps you prioritise where to focus your optimisation efforts for maximum competitive impact.
Related resources
Content gap analysis for AI
Content gap analysis for AI identifies queries where competitors are mentioned but you are not — revealing specific content deficiencies you can address. Unlike traditional SEO gap analysis that focuses on keyword rankings, AI content gap analysis focuses on the actual responses AI engines generate and the sources they cite.
When a competitor appears in an AI response for a query relevant to your brand, the question is: what content does that competitor have that earned the mention? Often, the competitor has published a specific resource — a comparison page, a detailed guide, a data report — that the AI engine treats as authoritative for that query. Identifying these resources tells you exactly what content to create or improve.
A gap analysis compares your citation sources against competitors' citation sources, revealing which competitor pages are earning citations you could compete for. It should also analyse the content characteristics of cited competitor pages — structure, length, schema markup, authority signals — giving you a blueprint for creating competitive content.
Related resources
Analysing competitor technical signals
Beyond content, competitors may hold technical advantages that boost their AI visibility. Analysing competitor technical signals involves reviewing their robots.txt for AI crawler access, checking for llms.txt and LLM Profile JSON, evaluating their structured data implementation, and assessing their site architecture for AI discoverability.
A competitor with a well-crafted llms.txt file and comprehensive schema markup has a structural advantage: AI engines can access and extract their content more efficiently. If your competitor allows all AI crawlers while your site blocks several, they will appear in more AI-powered responses simply because the engines can access their content.
Competitive technical benchmarking compares your technical AEO implementation against competitors. This reveals specific technical gaps — perhaps your competitor has FAQPage schema on every product page and you do not, or their site loads faster for AI crawlers, or they have a more comprehensive internal linking structure. Each technical gap is an actionable improvement opportunity.
Related resources
Competitive sentiment and positioning analysis
AI engines do not just mention brands — they describe, compare, and position them. Sentiment and positioning analysis examines how AI engines characterise your brand relative to competitors. Are you described as "affordable but limited" while a competitor is "comprehensive and enterprise-ready"? Do AI engines recommend you for specific use cases but not others?
This qualitative analysis reveals how AI engines have synthesised the available information about your brand into a narrative. That narrative may not match your desired positioning, and understanding the gap between your intended positioning and your AI-perceived positioning is essential for effective optimisation. If AI engines consistently describe you as a "budget option" when you want to be seen as "premium," you need to understand why and address the content signals driving that perception.
Hallucination detection is a critical component of this analysis. AI engines sometimes generate inaccurate descriptions of brands — wrong features, outdated pricing, confused product lines. Identifying these hallucinations across engines and queries allows you to create corrective content that provides AI engines with accurate information to counter the hallucinated claims.
Related resources
Turning competitive insights into action
The goal of AI competitor analysis is not just understanding — it is action. Every competitive insight should translate into a specific optimisation activity. A competitor with higher Share of Model on informational queries suggests you need more educational content. A competitor with better Citation Rate suggests they have structural advantages you can replicate. A competitor gaining momentum on a specific engine suggests a platform-specific strategy shift.
Translate competitive analysis into prioritised tasks. If the analysis reveals that a competitor's comparison page is being cited for queries where you have no equivalent content, add a task to create competitive comparison content with specific structural recommendations. If a competitor's llms.txt is better structured than yours, plan specific improvements.
Competitive monitoring should be ongoing, not a one-time exercise. AI models are updated frequently, competitors publish new content continuously, and the competitive landscape shifts accordingly. Weekly competitive benchmarking, combined with alerts for significant competitive changes, ensures you stay informed and can respond quickly when competitors make gains.
AI Competitor Analysis Guide FAQ
Key concepts
Explore relevant use cases
AI Brand Monitoring
Check how AI engines mention, describe, and recommend your brand across the major models.
AI Competitive Intelligence
See where competitors appear in AI responses and identify gaps in your AI visibility.
SERP vs AI Gap Analysis
Identify keywords where you rank on Google but are invisible in AI responses.
Can AI crawlers read and cite your site?
Run the free check to see technical signals: AI crawler access, sitemap, llms.txt, schema markup, and FAQ and comparison pages. It does not read live AI answers. No account needed.